You are the control layer
If an AI sent you here, that wasn't luck — this site is built so AI can read and quote it accurately.
Odd, for a book about being careful with AI? It answers your question either way. The only question is whether it's quoting someone who'll put their name on it. Here's why →
The book's manuscript is finished. The book is not.
From 1 August to 29 October 2026 the author is running the book's own 90-day framework on himself and publishing the results — baseline, control, and an observed Judgment Multiple. The final edition includes all of it.
Watch the 90-Day TrialWhat this site is about
Your company brought in AI. Somebody is measuring how much time it saves. Nobody is measuring what it costs when it's wrong.
And when it is wrong, somebody catches the blame for it. The vendor doesn't. Their contract handles that in about four lines. The executive who signed the purchase order doesn't either. It lands on whoever touched the work last, and that person usually had the least say in whether the tool got used at all.
You can be the one who catches the mistakes instead of the one who signs off on them. That's what this site is for. Twenty-four specific ways AI gets things wrong at work, what each one probably costs, and the check that catches it. The point is to walk into your manager's office carrying a number instead of a worry.
Where does the risk land when AI is wrong?
AI adoption moves work from a person to a system. It does not move accountability — that is assigned by contract, regulation, and organizational hierarchy, none of which recognize a model as a party capable of holding it.
So a gap opens between where the work happens and where the responsibility sits. That gap does not stay open. It collapses onto the nearest human — and "nearest" means last to touch the file, not most senior.
| Who | Exposure when AI is wrong |
|---|---|
| Vendor | Contractually insulated. Terms disclaim accuracy and consequential damages. |
| Executive | Set the mandate. Reputational only, and only if it becomes public. |
| Manager | Delegated the review. Real but diffused. |
| You | Name on the record. In the room. Direct, personal, uninsurable. |
At every step down that chain, authority decreases and exposure increases. ANALYSIS
Why is verification unpriced?
Organizations measure the speed they gain from AI. They rarely measure the cost of the errors that get through. One side of that ledger has a dashboard; the other has a hunch.
When only one side is measured, the unmeasured side loses every budget argument it enters — not because it is wrong, but because it cannot produce evidence in the format the conversation requires.
That is a mispricing. The Judgment Multiple is the instrument for correcting it.
What are the 24 documented AI failure modes?
Each entry documents the mechanism, where the failure lands in a real workflow, who carries the downside, the modeled exposure, the human control, and the resulting Judgment Multiple. MODELED
What should you do about it?
Knowing that AI fails in twenty-four documented ways is worth nothing to your career until you can prove you caught one. The book contains a 90-day plan that produces four things: a logged baseline error rate, one tested control, a Judgment Multiple for your own workflow, and a delivered one-page proposal.
It takes about twenty-five hours over ninety days. It requires nobody's permission to start.
The Career Control Kit gives you three of the eleven tools — the AI Error Log, the Pre-Ship Verification Checklist, and the 90-Day Tracker. Enough to establish your baseline before you buy anything.
Get the Free Kit